top of page

The New Physics of Business Opex

  • Writer: Patrick Halford
    Patrick Halford
  • 7 days ago
  • 6 min read

THE ICEBERG MOMENT


For decades, we've understood OPEX through a simple equation: more growth requires more people (and other resource), more people require more budget, more budget requires board approval. This linear thinking has shaped every strategic planning session, every headcount request, every departmental expansion. But here's what's happening beneath the surface—the part of the iceberg you can't see from

the boardroom:


Some of your existing teams could already be operating at 2x, 3x, even 5x their previous

capacity. Your competitors, customers and AI-first startups probably are.


Not through longer hours or burnout, but through real-time AI augmentation that's happening right now, across every workflow, at different speeds in different departments. The R&D team that used to take six weeks to prototype? They're doing it in days. The sales team that could handle 50 prospects per quarter? They're nurturing 300, with better personalisation and conversion rates. The finance team that spent two weeks on month-end close? Now they're spending two days. Legal team bottlenecks on deal negotiations? Evaporating. This isn't a future scenario. This is happening today, often invisible to traditional OPEX reporting.


WHY THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING: The Old Model: Linear Scaling


Traditional OPEX planning assumed fixed ratios in across industries. If revenue was to grow 30%, you might need roughly 20-30% more people. If you wanted to enter three new markets, you budgeted for three regional teams or go the acquisition route. The algebra was simple, predictable, and fundamentally limiting. The hidden cost? Every growth initiative competed for the same finite resource—approved headcount. Innovation became a zero-sum game. Speed was gated by hiring cycles. Opportunity windows closed while you were still posting job descriptions.


The New Model: Exponential Leverage


AI breaks the linear relationship between capacity and cost. When your team of 50 can

accomplish what previously required 250, the economics don't just improve incrementally—

they transform completely:


• Time collapses: Projects that took quarters now take weeks. Not because people work

faster, but because AI handles the repetitive, the analytical, the pattern-matching that

consumed 60-70% of knowledge work. It also helps teams discover things they had never

thought of doing (how do you cost that out?).


• Friction vanishes: The lag between insight and action collapses. Deals that required three

meetings, two proposals, and a pricing review? They're happening in a single conversation

with real-time data, instant scenario modeling, and dynamic pricing optimisation.


• Cost/performance ratios explode: Your existing salary base—already committed, already

approved—suddenly drives 3x the output. The marginal cost of additional capacity

approaches zero.


This isn't about squeezing more from your people. It's about removing the constraints that

limited what they could achieve.


THE STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS: For Boards: A New Valuation Paradigm


When growth decouples from headcount, multiples change. A company that can scale revenue 40% with 0% headcount growth isn't just more profitable—it's fundamentally more valuable. The capital efficiency metrics that drive valuations transform overnight.

Consider: If your competitors are still scaling linearly while you're scaling exponentially, you're not competing in the same category anymore. You're playing a different game with different rules. Of course the opposite could be true.


For Investors: Where the Alpha Hides


Traditional due diligence examines headcount plans, org charts, and salary scaling. But the real question is: How deeply has (can) AI penetrated this company's operating rhythm?

The winners won't be the companies with the biggest AI budgets or the most data scientists.

They'll be the ones where AI augmentation is woven into every role, every decision, every

customer interaction. Where the operations manager, the sales rep, the product marketer,

legal, R&D, the leadership team and Board are all riding exponentials.Look beneath the salary sheets. The untapped potential isn't in the new budget requests—it's in the existing teams suddenly capable of 10x impact. And the AI capabilities we have today will continue to 3X on a rolling quarterly basis.


For Leadership: The Structural Opportunity


Here's where skepticism usually appears: "But we have structures, reporting lines, incentive

schemes built around the old model. We can't just flip a switch."

True. And here's the insight that changes the conversation:

You can model the new structure in hours, not months. Using the same AI tools your teams are already deploying, you can:


• Map current workflow bottlenecks and AI-augmentation opportunities


• Model capacity scenarios across different adoption speeds


• Redesign incentives around output, not input


• Stress-test organisational structures against growth scenarios


• …on a regular basis.


This isn't theoretical planning. It's rapid prototyping of your entire operating model. It costs less than a typical leadership offsite focused on building a new mission statement, and delivers infinitely more clarity.


THE PHYSICS OF THE NEW OPEX


Traditional approaches to OPEX were perfectly adequate for the world we knew, where

resources (people) moved at predictable speeds (productivity) with measurable forces

(budgets). AI, applied sensibly and boldly, brings a phase transition. Time dilates. Distances shrink. Language barriers evaporate. What looked like fixed constraints are revealed as relative, malleable, context-dependent.


In practical terms:


• Markets: You can test, learn, and pivot in new geographies without building local

infrastructure first. AI-powered market analysis, customer testing, and localisation happen

in real-time.


• Products: The cycle from concept to customer feedback collapses. R&D teams prototype in

days, test with AI-generated scenarios, and iterate based on synthetic customer panels

before investing in traditional development.


• Deals: Sales cycles compress because every interaction carries institutional knowledge,

every proposal reflects real-time competitive intelligence, every negotiation point is backed

by instant scenario analysis.


The companies that internalise this will run circles around those still operating under

traditional (2024) assumptions.


THE CALL TO ACTION


This transformation isn't waiting for permission. It's already happening in pockets across our

organisations—wherever individual contributors have discovered they can work smarter, faster, better with AI augmentation. The question for leadership is whether this evolution happens organically, chaotically, with massive opportunity cost as some teams sprint ahead while others lag (new bottlenecks)—or whether you architect it strategically. And remember, new capabilities (use cases) emerge weekly, often showing up in other industries (and every morning on YouTube).


The immediate next step: Take two hours. Use AI to model your current OPEX against different adoption scenarios. Not as a theoretical exercise, but as a concrete analysis:


• Where is AI already driving 2x+ productivity gains?


• Where are the structural bottlenecks preventing faster adoption?


• Where could friction fall away over night? Can you put a number on that?


• What does your org chart look like if you optimise for evolving AI-augmented capacity?


• How do incentives need to evolve to reward output over input?


• How could you operationalise dynamic budgeting to allow productivity to flow across silos

and line items in the budget?


• If our OPEX is morphing what does this do to our CAPEX assumptions? SG&A? COGS?


• Can we allocate more to the margin AND increase R&D without increasing budgets?


• If we model AI exponentials out, do we need that acquisition to scale in 4 months? Or can

we handle it with existing resources?


• What will be the cultural and operational impact on the teams, budget owners, leadership

and Board for these evolving shifts?


To model these out, you will use similar AI tools that your teams are already using on a daily

basis (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini etc.). And the insights will fundamentally reshape how you think about growth.


THE BOTTOM LINE


Your salary sheets are lying to you. Not because the numbers are wrong, but because they tell a story about capacity that's already obsolete. Those same people, with the same base

compensation, are capable of dramatically more—right now—if the organisational structure,

tools, and incentives align.This is why OPEX budgets have never been more intriguing. For the first time in business history, your cost base can grow slower than your revenue, your capacity, your market reach. The constraint isn't budget anymore—it's imagination and execution speed.


Welcome to the era where structural drag no longer dictates growth. Where creativity and

execution can align instantly. Where deals happen in days, not quarters. Where your existing

investment in people becomes the foundation for exponential expansion. The leaders who understand these new laws of physics won't just win their markets. They'll redefine what winning looks like.


This perspective forms the foundation for strategic AI-augmented scaling in modern enterprises. The companies that internalise these principles today will create competitive moats that traditional operators cannot cross tomorrow.


Patrick Halford (Patrick.halford@gaoithe.org)

 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Recognising Value You Didn't Expect

Why Some Leadership Teams Unlock Stranded Capacity While Others Remain Prisoners of Annual Budget Cycles. Last night, an executive coach posed a question to a forum of leaders: "Can you recognize valu

 
 
bottom of page